|
2026 |
Agentic Coding 2.0 leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
Agents Are Systems, Not Models: Rethinking Agentic Evaluation |
Wiedmann et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Agents' Last Exam |
Sun et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Agents' Last Exam leaderboard |
team |
|
|
2026 |
AI Coding Agents Can Reproduce Social Science Findings |
Alizadeh et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
AI-Driven Reproducibility and Analytical Robustness in Scientific Discovery |
Liu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
AMA-Bench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Memory for Agentic Applications |
Zhao et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
ARC-AGI-3 |
Foundation |
|
|
2026 |
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 |
Analysis |
|
|
2026 |
AstaBench: Rigorous Benchmarking of AI Agents with a Scientific Research Suite |
Bragg et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
AutomationBench |
Shepard, Salimans |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
AutomationBench leaderboard |
Zapier |
|
|
2026 |
AutoReproduce: Automatic AI Experiment Reproduction with Paper Lineage |
Zhao et al. |
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) |
|
2026 |
BizAgentBench: Unveiling Hidden Challenges in Deploying Long-Horizon Agents for Real-World Business |
Zhao et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Can AI Agents Answer Your Data Questions? A Benchmark for Data Agents |
Ma et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Can Coding Agents Reproduce Findings in Computational Materials Science? |
Huang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Coding-agents can replicate scientific machine learning papers |
Hans, Bilionis |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Company Knowledge Bench |
Kapa.ai |
|
|
2026 |
CompMat-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents for Computational Materials Science |
Zhang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Continual Learning Bench (site and leaderboard) |
Berkeley |
|
|
2026 |
Continual Learning Bench: Evaluating Frontier AI Systems in Real-World Stateful Environments |
Asawa et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmark |
Siegel et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at Scale |
Wang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
DeepPlanning: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Agentic Planning with Verifiable Constraints |
Zhang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
DeepSWE v1.1 |
Datacurve |
|
|
2026 |
Demystifying evals for AI agents |
Anthropic |
|
|
2026 |
DevOps-Gym: Benchmarking AI Agents in Software DevOps Cycle |
Tang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Digital Work Index |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
EmbodiedCLBench: Evaluating Continual Learning for Self-Evolving Embodied Agents |
Huang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
EurekaBench: Measuring Agentic Ability to Discover New Scientific Insights |
Geng et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions |
Hu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
FIRE-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on the Rediscovery of Scientific Insights |
Wang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
FrontierCode |
Cognition |
|
|
2026 |
Hidden Measurement Error in LLM Pipelines Distorts Annotation, Evaluation, and Benchmarking |
Messing |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Humanity's Last Exam |
Phan et al. |
Nature |
|
2026 |
Into the Unknown: Benchmarking AI agents on open scientific research problems |
Kim et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
KaliBench: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Cybersecurity Tool Use on Kali Linux with Runtime-Free Verifiable Rewards |
Li et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
LibraryDesignBench leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
Life After Benchmark Saturation: A Case Study of CORE-Bench |
Nadgir et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench: Testing the Limits of Agents on Long-Horizon Terminal Tasks with Dense Reward-Based Grading |
Li et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
MBABench 2.0 leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
MCP-Atlas: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Tool-Use Competency with Real MCP Servers |
Bandi et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks |
Kwa et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Mem2ActBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Long-Term Memory Utilization in Task-Oriented Autonomous Agents |
Shen et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
MirrorCode |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
MLReplicate: Benchmarking Autonomous Research Systems for Machine Learning Reproducibility |
Gaddipati et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agents |
Ding et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
OSWorld 2.0: Benchmarking Computer Use Agents on Long-Horizon Real-World Tasks |
Yuan et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
PAPERBENCHX: Can AI Reproduce Science Across Disciplines? |
Wu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
PRBench: End-to-end Paper Reproduction in Physics Research |
Qiu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Read the Paper, Write the Code: Agentic Reproduction of Social-Science Results |
Kohler et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
RECLAIM: Can Agents Reproduce the Claims of Machine Learning Papers? |
Salunkhe et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
ReplicatorBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Replicability in Social and Behavioral Sciences |
Nguyen et al. |
Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 |
|
2026 |
Revibing Code from Papers: Reimplementing HCI Artifacts |
Adar et al. |
Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology |
|
2026 |
RExBench: Can coding agents autonomously implement AI research extensions? |
Edwards et al. |
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) |
|
2026 |
SearchHorizonBench: A Benchmark for Search Value in AI Agents |
Ning et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Senior SWE-bench leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
SkillLearnBench: Benchmarking Continual Learning Methods for Agent Skill Generation on Real-World Tasks |
Zhong et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
SlopCode Bench leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
SnorkelFinance 2.0 leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
SnorkelLegal leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
SnorkelManufacturing leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
SnorkelRevOps leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
SnorkelUnderwrite 2.0 leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents |
Yehudai et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
SWE-bench CLI leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
SWE-bench leaderboards |
team |
|
|
2026 |
SWE-Bench Pro V2 |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
Terminal-Bench (site and leaderboard) |
(Stanford |
|
|
2026 |
Terminal-Bench 3.0 |
team |
|
|
2026 |
Terminal-Bench 4.0 leaderboard |
Institute |
|
|
2026 |
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 |
team |
|
|
2026 |
Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces |
Merrill et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
The AI Replication Engine: First Experiments and What's Next |
(I4R) |
|
|
2026 |
The Next Challenge for Agentic Cybersecurity: A Realistic, Contamination-Free Reverse Engineering Benchmark |
Spence et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
The Tool Decathlon: Benchmarking Language Agents for Diverse, Realistic, and Long-Horizon Task Execution |
Li et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
WebChoreArena: Evaluating Web Browsing Agents on Realistic Tedious Web Tasks |
Miyai et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
What We Learned by Reproducing 2,200 Papers from ICML |
Face |
|
|
2026 |
When Does Memory Help? A Cost-Aware Evaluation of Long-Term Memory in Tool-Using LLM Agents |
Mishra, Mishra |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Why we no longer evaluate SWE-bench Verified |
OpenAI |
|
|
2026 |
WorkplaceAgents leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2025 |
$τ^2$-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment |
Barres et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
ACEBench: Who Wins the Match Point in Tool Usage? |
Chen et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents |
Liu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments |
Schmidgall et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents |
Andriushchenko et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
An Illusion of Progress? Assessing the Current State of Web Agents |
Xue et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agents |
Rawles et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
APIGen-MT: Agentic Pipeline for Multi-Turn Data Generation via Simulated Agent-Human Interplay |
Prabhakar et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
ARE: Scaling Up Agent Environments and Evaluations |
Froger et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
AstaBench: Rigorous benchmarking of AI agents with a holistic scientific research suite |
Ai2 |
|
|
2025 |
BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Games |
Paglieri et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
BEARCUBS: A benchmark for computer-using web agents |
Song et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard |
Gorilla |
|
|
2025 |
BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions |
Zhuo et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
BixBench: a Comprehensive Benchmark for LLM-based Agents in Computational Biology |
Mitchener et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
BountyBench: Dollar Impact of AI Agent Attackers and Defenders on Real-World Cybersecurity Systems |
Zhang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agent |
Chen et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
BrowseComp: a benchmark for browsing agents |
OpenAI |
|
|
2025 |
BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agents |
Wei et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
CodeElo: Benchmarking Competition-level Code Generation of LLMs with Human-comparable Elo Ratings |
Quan et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
CRMArena: Understanding the Capacity of LLM Agents to Perform Professional CRM Tasks in Realistic Environments |
Huang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilities |
Zhu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Models |
Zhang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents |
Du et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Design2Code: Benchmarking Multimodal Code Generation for Automated Front-End Engineering |
Si et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents from Becoming Data Science Experts? |
Jing et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making |
Li et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agents |
Yang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Environments Hub |
Intellect |
|
|
2025 |
Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub |
AI |
|
|
2025 |
Establishing Best Practices for Building Rigorous Agentic Benchmarks |
Zhu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey |
Mohammadi et al. |
Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 |
|
2025 |
EXP-Bench: Can AI Conduct AI Research Experiments? |
Kon et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Finance Agent Benchmark: Benchmarking LLMs on Real-world Financial Research Tasks |
Bigeard et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
From Reproduction to Replication: Evaluating Research Agents with Progressive Code Masking |
Kim et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
GDPval: Evaluating AI Model Performance on Real-World Economically Valuable Tasks |
Patwardhan et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
GDPval: measuring the performance of our models on real-world tasks |
OpenAI |
|
|
2025 |
Harbor: framework for agent evals and RL environments |
Institute |
|
|
2025 |
HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks |
Rein et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Holistic Agent Leaderboard |
SAgE |
|
|
2025 |
Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation |
Kapoor et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
IntellAgent: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evaluating Conversational AI Systems |
Levi, Kadar |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
KernelBench: Can LLMs Write Efficient GPU Kernels? |
Ouyang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
LiveCodeBench Pro: How Do Olympiad Medalists Judge LLMs in Competitive Programming? |
Zheng et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
LMR-BENCH: Evaluating LLM Agent's Ability on Reproducing Language Modeling Research |
Yan et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memory |
Wu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
macOSWorld: A Multilingual Interactive Benchmark for GUI Agents |
Yang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
MCP-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using LLM Agents with Complex Real-World Tasks via MCP Servers |
Wang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
MCP-Universe: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Real-World Model Context Protocol Servers |
Luo et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
MCPMark: A Benchmark for Stress-Testing Realistic and Comprehensive MCP Use |
Wu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Tasks |
METR |
|
|
2025 |
MedAgentBench: A Realistic Virtual EHR Environment to Benchmark Medical LLM Agents |
Jiang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
MemBench: Towards More Comprehensive Evaluation on the Memory of LLM-based Agents |
Tan et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judge |
Gou et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering |
Chan et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agents |
Nathani et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
MLRC-Bench: Can Language Agents Solve Machine Learning Research Challenges? |
Zhang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolving |
Zan et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents |
Zhu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Security |
Shao et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
OS-Harm: A Benchmark for Measuring Safety of Computer Use Agents |
Kuntz et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
OSWorld site and OSWorld-Verified leaderboard |
Lab |
|
|
2025 |
PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Research |
Starace et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
R2E-Gym: Procedural Environments and Hybrid Verifiers for Scaling Open-Weights SWE Agents |
Jain et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human experts |
Wijk et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
REASONING GYM: Reasoning Environments for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards |
Stojanovski et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Remote Labor Index |
CAIS |
|
|
2025 |
Remote Labor Index: Measuring AI Automation of Remote Work |
Mazeika et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
ReplicationBench: Can AI Agents Replicate Astrophysics Research Papers? |
Ye et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research? |
Hu et al. |
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025 |
|
2025 |
ResearchCodeBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Implementing Novel Machine Learning Research Code |
Hua et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discovery |
Chen et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
SciReplicate-Bench: Benchmarking LLMs in Agent-driven Algorithmic Reproduction from Research Papers |
Xiang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
ScreenSpot-Pro: GUI Grounding for Professional High-Resolution Computer Use |
Li et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Spider 2.0: Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Enterprise Text-to-SQL Workflows |
Lei et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
StableToolBench: Towards Stable Large-Scale Benchmarking on Tool Learning of Large Language Models |
Guo et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
SWE-bench Goes Live! |
Zhang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks? |
Deng et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn $1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering? |
Miserendino et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
SWE-PolyBench: A multi-language benchmark for repository level evaluation of coding agents |
Rashid et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
SWE-rebench: An Automated Pipeline for Task Collection and Decontaminated Evaluation of Software Engineering Agents |
Badertdinov et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agents |
Yang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
SWT-Bench: Testing and Validating Real-World Bug-Fixes with Code Agents |
Mündler et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL): From Tool Use to Agentic Evaluation of Large Language Models |
Patil et al. |
Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning |
|
2025 |
The BrowserGym Ecosystem for Web Agent Research |
Chezelles et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
The SWE-Bench Illusion: When State-of-the-Art LLMs Remember Instead of Reason |
Liang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Tasks |
Xu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilities |
Lu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Training Software Engineering Agents and Verifiers with SWE-Gym |
Pan et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Vending-Bench 2 |
Labs |
|
|
2025 |
Vending-Bench: A Benchmark for Long-Term Coherence of Autonomous Agents |
Backlund, Petersson |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail? |
Cemri et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
WideSearch: Benchmarking Agentic Broad Info-Seeking |
Wong et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
WorkArena++: Towards Compositional Planning and Reasoning-based Common Knowledge Work Tasks |
Boisvert et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
$τ$-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains |
Yao et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
Adding Error Bars to Evals: A Statistical Approach to Language Model Evaluations |
Miller |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents |
Ma et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents |
Debenedetti et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
AgentGym: Evolving Large Language Model-based Agents across Diverse Environments |
Xi et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
AI Agents That Matter |
Kapoor et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
Aider LLM Leaderboards (Polyglot) |
Aider |
|
|
2024 |
AndroidLab: Training and Systematic Benchmarking of Android Autonomous Agents |
Xu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agents |
Trivedi et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
AssistantBench: Can Web Agents Solve Realistic and Time-Consuming Tasks? |
Yoran et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
BEHAVIOR-1K: A Human-Centered, Embodied AI Benchmark with 1,000 Everyday Activities and Realistic Simulation |
Li et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference |
Chiang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
Commit0: Library Generation from Scratch |
Zhao et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
DA-Code: Agent Data Science Code Generation Benchmark for Large Language Models |
Huang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language Models |
Majumder et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents |
Jansen et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agents |
Maharana et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox |
Ruan et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
InfiAgent-DABench: Evaluating Agents on Data Analysis Tasks |
Hu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents |
Zhan et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
Inspect |
Institute |
|
|
2024 |
Inspect Evals |
contributors |
|
|
2024 |
Introducing SWE-bench Verified |
OpenAI |
|
|
2024 |
LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research |
Laurent et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code |
Jain et al. |
arXiv |