|
2026 |
Human-AI Collaboration for Estimating Scientific Replicability |
Chakravorti et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Predicting results of social science experiments using large language models |
Ashokkumar et al. |
Nature |
|
2026 |
SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment |
Baumgärtner, Gurevych |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
The threat of analytic flexibility in using large language models to simulate human data |
Cummins |
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science |
|
2026 |
This human study did not involve human subjects: Validating LLM simulations as behavioral evidence |
Hullman et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Using prediction markets and forecasting surveys to predict 28 replication outcomes of classic articles in social psychology and judgement and decision making |
Chandrashekar et al. |
Royal Society Open Science |
|
2025 |
A large-scale replication of scenario-based experiments in psychology and management using large language models |
Cui et al. |
Nature Computational Science |
|
2025 |
Identifying Non-Replicable Social Science Studies with Language Models |
Saynova et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience results |
Luo et al. |
Nature Human Behaviour |
|
2025 |
Large language models that replace human participants can harmfully misportray and flatten identity groups |
Wang et al. |
Nature Machine Intelligence |
|
2025 |
Predicting the replicability of social and behavioural science claims in COVID-19 preprints |
Marcoci et al. |
Nature Human Behaviour |
|
2025 |
Six Fallacies in Substituting Large Language Models for Human Participants |
Lin |
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science |
|
2024 |
Can Generative AI improve social science? |
Bail |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
|
2024 |
Generative Agent Simulations of 1,000 People |
Park et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
The Illusion of Artificial Inclusion |
Agnew et al. |
Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems |
|
2024 |
Using Large Language Models to Create AI Personas for Replication, Generalization and Prediction of Media Effects: An Empirical Test of 133 Published Experimental Research Findings |
Yeykelis et al. |
arXiv |
|
2023 |
A discipline-wide investigation of the replicability of Psychology papers over the past two decades |
Youyou et al. |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
|
2023 |
Can AI language models replace human participants? |
Dillion et al. |
Trends in Cognitive Sciences |
|
2023 |
Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples |
Argyle et al. |
Political Analysis |
|
2023 |
Replicating replicability modeling of psychology papers |
Mottelson, Kontogiorgos |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
|
2023 |
Reply to Crockett et al. and Mottelson and Kontogiorgos: Machine learning’s scientific significance and future impact on replicability research |
Youyou et al. |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
|
2023 |
The limitations of machine learning models for predicting scientific replicability |
Crockett et al. |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
|
2023 |
Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studies |
Aher et al. |
Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning |
|
2020 |
Estimating the deep replicability of scientific findings using human and artificial intelligence |
Yang et al. |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
|
2019 |
Predicting the replicability of social science lab experiments |
Altmejd et al. |
PLOS ONE |
|
2015 |
Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research |
Dreber et al. |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |