|
2026 |
Agentic Coding 2.0 leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
Agents Are Systems, Not Models: Rethinking Agentic Evaluation |
Wiedmann et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Agents' Last Exam |
Sun et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Agents' Last Exam leaderboard |
team |
|
|
2026 |
AI Coding Agents Can Reproduce Social Science Findings |
Alizadeh et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
AI Coding Agents Can Reproduce Social Science Findings |
Alizadeh et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
AI Coding Agents in Social Science: Methodologically Diverse, Empirically Consistent, Interpretively Vulnerable |
Alizadeh et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
AI-assisted teams outperform AI-led teams but not human-only teams in assessing research reproducibility in quantitative social science |
Brodeur et al. |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
|
2026 |
AI-Driven Reproducibility and Analytical Robustness in Scientific Discovery |
Liu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
AMA-Bench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Memory for Agentic Applications |
Zhao et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
An Agentic Approach Towards Replication Package Quality Evaluation |
Mbida, Angermeir |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review |
Riehl et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
ARC-AGI-3 |
Foundation |
|
|
2026 |
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 |
Analysis |
|
|
2026 |
AstaBench: Rigorous Benchmarking of AI Agents with a Scientific Research Suite |
Bragg et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Automated reproducibility assessments in the social and behavioral sciences using large language models |
Holtdirk et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Automated Reproducibility Has a Problem Statement Problem |
Snelleman et al. |
RAI Workshop at AAAI 2026 |
|
2026 |
Automating Computational Reproducibility in Social Science: Comparing Prompt-Based and Agent-Based Approaches |
Shah et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
AutomationBench |
Shepard, Salimans |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
AutomationBench leaderboard |
Zapier |
|
|
2026 |
AutoReproduce: Automatic AI Experiment Reproduction with Paper Lineage |
Zhao et al. |
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) |
|
2026 |
AutoReproduce: Automatic AI Experiment Reproduction with Paper Lineage |
Zhao et al. |
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) |
|
2026 |
Beyond pass@1: A Reliability Science Framework for Long-Horizon LLM Agents |
Khanal et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
BizAgentBench: Unveiling Hidden Challenges in Deploying Long-Horizon Agents for Real-World Business |
Zhao et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Can AI Agents Answer Your Data Questions? A Benchmark for Data Agents |
Ma et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Can Coding Agents Reproduce Findings in Computational Materials Science? |
Huang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Can Coding Agents Reproduce Findings in Computational Materials Science? |
Huang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
CodeDistiller: Automatically Generating Code Libraries for Scientific Coding Agents |
Jansen et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Coding-agents can replicate scientific machine learning papers |
Hans, Bilionis |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Coding-agents can replicate scientific machine learning papers |
Hans, Bilionis |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Company Knowledge Bench |
Kapa.ai |
|
|
2026 |
CompMat-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents for Computational Materials Science |
Zhang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Continual Learning Bench (site and leaderboard) |
Berkeley |
|
|
2026 |
Continual Learning Bench: Evaluating Frontier AI Systems in Real-World Stateful Environments |
Asawa et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmark |
Siegel et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at Scale |
Wang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
DeepPlanning: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Agentic Planning with Verifiable Constraints |
Zhang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
DeepSWE v1.1 |
Datacurve |
|
|
2026 |
Demystifying evals for AI agents |
Anthropic |
|
|
2026 |
Deployment Decision Reliability: A Generalizability-Theory Framework for Sizing Long-Horizon Agent Evaluations |
Srinivasan |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
DevOps-Gym: Benchmarking AI Agents in Software DevOps Cycle |
Tang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Digital Work Index |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
Does It Reproduce? An open, auditable archive of reproducibility assessments of scientific publications |
Hamburg-Eppendorf |
|
|
2026 |
EmbodiedCLBench: Evaluating Continual Learning for Self-Evolving Embodied Agents |
Huang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
EurekaBench: Measuring Agentic Ability to Discover New Scientific Insights |
Geng et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions |
Hu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
FAIR-D: An Extension to the FAIR Principles for Open Hardware Replicability in Human-Computer Interaction |
Simon et al. |
Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems |
|
2026 |
FIRE-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on the Rediscovery of Scientific Insights |
Wang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
FIRE-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on the Rediscovery of Scientific Insights |
Wang et al. |
Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning |
|
2026 |
From paper to benchmark: agentic, framework-based reproduction of under-specified methods in machine health intelligence |
Theiler et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
FrontierCode |
Cognition |
|
|
2026 |
Hidden Measurement Error in LLM Pipelines Distorts Annotation, Evaluation, and Benchmarking |
Messing |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Hidden Measurement Error in LLM Pipelines Distorts Annotation, Evaluation, and Benchmarking |
Messing |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation |
Kapoor et al. |
International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) |
|
2026 |
How Consistent Are LLM Agents? Measuring Behavioral Reproducibility in Multi-Step Tool-Calling Pipelines |
Yagubyan |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Human-AI Collaboration for Estimating Scientific Replicability |
Chakravorti et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Humanity's Last Exam |
Phan et al. |
Nature |
|
2026 |
Interaction Models: A Scalable Approach to Human-AI Collaboration |
|
Thinking Machines Lab: Connectionism |
|
2026 |
Into the Unknown: Benchmarking AI agents on open scientific research problems |
Kim et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences |
Aczel et al. |
Nature |
|
2026 |
Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences |
Tyner et al. |
Nature |
|
2026 |
Investigating the reproducibility of the social and behavioural sciences |
Miske et al. |
Nature |
|
2026 |
It's Not Just the Prompt: Model Choice Dominates LLM Creative Output |
Haase et al. |
Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems |
|
2026 |
KaliBench: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Cybersecurity Tool Use on Kali Linux with Runtime-Free Verifiable Rewards |
Li et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
LibraryDesignBench leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
Life After Benchmark Saturation: A Case Study of CORE-Bench |
Nadgir et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Life After Benchmark Saturation: A Case Study of CORE-Bench |
Nadgir et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench: Testing the Limits of Agents on Long-Horizon Terminal Tasks with Dense Reward-Based Grading |
Li et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Lost in Benchmarks? Rethinking Large Language Model Benchmarking with Item Response Theory |
Zhou et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Many AI analysts, one dataset: Navigating the agentic data science multiverse |
Bertran et al. |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
|
2026 |
MBABench 2.0 leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
MCP-Atlas: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Tool-Use Competency with Real MCP Servers |
Bandi et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks |
Kwa et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Mem2ActBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Long-Term Memory Utilization in Task-Oriented Autonomous Agents |
Shen et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
MirrorCode |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
MLReplicate: Benchmarking Autonomous Research Systems for Machine Learning Reproducibility |
Gaddipati et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
MLReplicate: Benchmarking Autonomous Research Systems for Machine Learning Reproducibility |
Gaddipati et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agents |
Ding et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
On the Computational Reproducibility of Human-Computer Interaction |
Iarygina et al. |
Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems |
|
2026 |
OSWorld 2.0: Benchmarking Computer Use Agents on Long-Horizon Real-World Tasks |
Yuan et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Paper2Code: Automating Code Generation from Scientific Papers in Machine Learning |
Seo et al. |
International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) |
|
2026 |
PAPERBENCHX: Can AI Reproduce Science Across Disciplines? |
Wu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
PaperRepro: Automated Computational Reproducibility Assessment for Social Science Papers |
Zhang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
PRBench: End-to-end Paper Reproduction in Physics Research |
Qiu |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
PRBench: End-to-end Paper Reproduction in Physics Research |
Qiu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Predicting results of social science experiments using large language models |
Ashokkumar et al. |
Nature |
|
2026 |
Progressive Autonomy as Preference Learning: A Formalization of Trust Calibration for Agentic Tool Use |
Ou |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Read the Paper, Write the Code: Agentic Reproduction of Social-Science Results |
Kohler et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Read the Paper, Write the Code: Agentic Reproduction of Social-Science Results |
Kohler et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
RECLAIM: Can Agents Reproduce the Claims of Machine Learning Papers? |
Salunkhe et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Reimagining research papers as interactive and reliable AI agents |
Miao et al. |
Nature |
|
2026 |
ReplicatorBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Replicability in Social and Behavioral Sciences |
Nguyen et al. |
Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 |
|
2026 |
ReplicatorBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Replicability in Social and Behavioral Sciences |
Nguyen et al. |
Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 (KDD '26) |
|
2026 |
Reproducibility and robustness of economics and political science research |
Brodeur et al. |
Nature |
|
2026 |
Reproducing ICML 2026 — Open Reproductions |
Face, alphaXiv |
|
|
2026 |
ReproRepo: Scaling Reproducibility Audits with GitHub Repository Issues |
Li et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Revibing Code from Papers: Reimplementing HCI Artifacts |
Adar et al. |
Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology |
|
2026 |
Revibing Code from Papers: Reimplementing HCI Artifacts |
Adar et al. |
Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology |
|
2026 |
Revibing Code from Papers: Reimplementing HCI Artifacts |
Adar et al. |
Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '26) |
|
2026 |
RExBench: Can coding agents autonomously implement AI research extensions? |
Edwards et al. |
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) |
|
2026 |
RExBench: Can coding agents autonomously implement AI research extensions? |
Edwards et al. |
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) |
|
2026 |
Scaling Reproducibility: An AI-Assisted Workflow for Large-Scale Replication and Reanalysis |
Xu, Yang |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment |
Baumgärtner, Gurevych |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
SearchHorizonBench: A Benchmark for Search Value in AI Agents |
Ning et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Senior SWE-bench leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
SkillLearnBench: Benchmarking Continual Learning Methods for Agent Skill Generation on Real-World Tasks |
Zhong et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
SlopCode Bench leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
SnorkelFinance 2.0 leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
SnorkelLegal leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
SnorkelManufacturing leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
SnorkelRevOps leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
SnorkelUnderwrite 2.0 leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents |
Yehudai et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
SWE-bench CLI leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
SWE-bench leaderboards |
team |
|
|
2026 |
SWE-Bench Pro V2 |
AI |
|
|
2026 |
Terminal-Bench (site and leaderboard) |
(Stanford |
|
|
2026 |
Terminal-Bench 3.0 |
team |
|
|
2026 |
Terminal-Bench 4.0 leaderboard |
Institute |
|
|
2026 |
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 |
team |
|
|
2026 |
Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces |
Merrill et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
The AI Replication Engine V2: Reading the Page, Mapping the Literature |
Barbarioli |
Institute for Replication blog |
|
2026 |
The AI Replication Engine: First Experiments and What's Next |
Barbarioli |
Institute for Replication (I4R) |
|
2026 |
The AI Replication Engine: First Experiments and What's Next |
(I4R) |
|
|
2026 |
The Next Challenge for Agentic Cybersecurity: A Realistic, Contamination-Free Reverse Engineering Benchmark |
Spence et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
The Story is Not the Science: Execution-Grounded Evaluation of Mechanistic Interpretability Research |
Bai et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
The threat of analytic flexibility in using large language models to simulate human data |
Cummins |
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science |
|
2026 |
The Tool Decathlon: Benchmarking Language Agents for Diverse, Realistic, and Long-Horizon Task Execution |
Li et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
This human study did not involve human subjects: Validating LLM simulations as behavioral evidence |
Hullman et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
TOP 2025: An update to the Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines |
Grant et al. |
Research Integrity and Peer Review |
|
2026 |
Towards a Science of AI Agent Reliability |
Rabanser et al. |
Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) |
|
2026 |
Towards Automating Scientific Review with Google's Paper Assistant Tool |
Jayaram et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Using prediction markets and forecasting surveys to predict 28 replication outcomes of classic articles in social psychology and judgement and decision making |
Chandrashekar et al. |
Royal Society Open Science |
|
2026 |
VERITAS: Towards a General-Purpose Replication Tool for Scientific Research |
Liu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
WebChoreArena: Evaluating Web Browsing Agents on Realistic Tedious Web Tasks |
Miyai et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
What Makes AI Research Replicable? Executable Knowledge Graphs as Scientific Knowledge Representations |
Luo et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
What Papers Don't Tell You: Recovering Tacit Knowledge for Automated Paper Reproduction |
Li et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
What We Learned by Reproducing 2,200 Papers from ICML |
Face |
|
|
2026 |
What We Learned by Reproducing 2,200 papers from ICML |
Abid et al. |
Hugging Face Blog |
|
2026 |
When Does Memory Help? A Cost-Aware Evaluation of Long-Term Memory in Tool-Using LLM Agents |
Mishra, Mishra |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Why we no longer evaluate SWE-bench Verified |
OpenAI |
|
|
2026 |
Within-Model vs Between-Prompt Variability in Large Language Models for Creative Tasks |
Haase et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
WorkplaceAgents leaderboard |
AI |
|
|
2025 |
"Seems Complicated and Unachievable": A Collaborative Autoethnography of Design Replication in Undergraduate Research |
Rios et al. |
Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium on HCI Education (EduCHI 2025) |
|
2025 |
$τ^2$-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment |
Barres et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
A large-scale replication of scenario-based experiments in psychology and management using large language models |
Cui et al. |
Nature Computational Science |
|
2025 |
ACEBench: Who Wins the Match Point in Tool Usage? |
Chen et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents |
Liu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments |
Schmidgall et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents |
Andriushchenko et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
An Illusion of Progress? Assessing the Current State of Web Agents |
Xue et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agents |
Rawles et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
APIGen-MT: Agentic Pipeline for Multi-Turn Data Generation via Simulated Agent-Human Interplay |
Prabhakar et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
ARE: Scaling Up Agent Environments and Evaluations |
Froger et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
AstaBench: Rigorous benchmarking of AI agents with a holistic scientific research suite |
Ai2 |
|
|
2025 |
BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Games |
Paglieri et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
BEARCUBS: A benchmark for computer-using web agents |
Song et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard |
Gorilla |
|
|
2025 |
BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions |
Zhuo et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
BixBench: a Comprehensive Benchmark for LLM-based Agents in Computational Biology |
Mitchener et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
BountyBench: Dollar Impact of AI Agent Attackers and Defenders on Real-World Cybersecurity Systems |
Zhang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agent |
Chen et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
BrowseComp: a benchmark for browsing agents |
OpenAI |
|
|
2025 |
BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agents |
Wei et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
CodeElo: Benchmarking Competition-level Code Generation of LLMs with Human-comparable Elo Ratings |
Quan et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Context is Key for Reproducibility of Empirical Studies in Human-Computer Interaction |
Vanderdonckt, Vatavu |
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Reproducibility and Replicability |
|
2025 |
CRMArena: Understanding the Capacity of LLM Agents to Perform Professional CRM Tasks in Realistic Environments |
Huang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilities |
Zhu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Models |
Zhang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents |
Du et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Design2Code: Benchmarking Multimodal Code Generation for Automated Front-End Engineering |
Si et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents from Becoming Data Science Experts? |
Jing et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making |
Li et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agents |
Yang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Environments Hub |
Intellect |
|
|
2025 |
Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub |
AI |
|
|
2025 |
Establishing Best Practices for Building Rigorous Agentic Benchmarks |
Zhu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey |
Mohammadi et al. |
Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 |
|
2025 |
EXP-Bench: Can AI Conduct AI Research Experiments? |
Kon et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Exploring the use of AI authors and reviewers at Agents4Science |
Bianchi et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Finance Agent Benchmark: Benchmarking LLMs on Real-world Financial Research Tasks |
Bigeard et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
From Reproduction to Replication: Evaluating Research Agents with Progressive Code Masking |
Kim et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
From Reproduction to Replication: Evaluating Research Agents with Progressive Code Masking |
Kim et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
GDPval: Evaluating AI Model Performance on Real-World Economically Valuable Tasks |
Patwardhan et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
GDPval: measuring the performance of our models on real-world tasks |
OpenAI |
|
|
2025 |
Harbor: framework for agent evals and RL environments |
Institute |
|
|
2025 |
HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks |
Rein et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Holistic Agent Leaderboard |
SAgE |
|
|
2025 |
Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation |
Kapoor et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Identifying Non-Replicable Social Science Studies with Language Models |
Saynova et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
IntellAgent: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evaluating Conversational AI Systems |
Levi, Kadar |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
KernelBench: Can LLMs Write Efficient GPU Kernels? |
Ouyang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience results |
Luo et al. |
Nature Human Behaviour |
|
2025 |
Large language models that replace human participants can harmfully misportray and flatten identity groups |
Wang et al. |
Nature Machine Intelligence |
|
2025 |
LiveCodeBench Pro: How Do Olympiad Medalists Judge LLMs in Competitive Programming? |
Zheng et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
LMR-BENCH: Evaluating LLM Agent's Ability on Reproducing Language Modeling Research |
Yan et al. |
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing |
|
2025 |
LMR-BENCH: Evaluating LLM Agent's Ability on Reproducing Language Modeling Research |
Yan et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memory |
Wu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
macOSWorld: A Multilingual Interactive Benchmark for GUI Agents |
Yang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
MCP-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using LLM Agents with Complex Real-World Tasks via MCP Servers |
Wang et al. |
arXiv |