Preprint · 2026
CodeDistiller: Automatically Generating Code Libraries for Scientific Coding Agents
| Venue | arXiv |
|---|---|
| DOI | 10.48550/arXiv.2512.01089 |
| URL | http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01089 |
| Topics | ReplicHAI / Agentic reproduction: systems & benchmarks |
| Tags | Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence |
| archiveID | arXiv:2512.01089 |
| extra | arXiv:2512.01089 [cs.AI] |
| libraryCatalog | arXiv.org |
| shortTitle | CodeDistiller |
Abstract
Automated Scientific Discovery (ASD) systems can help automatically generate and run code-based experiments, but their capabilities are limited by the code they can reliably generate from parametric knowledge alone. As a result, current systems either mutate a small number of manually-crafted experiment examples, or operate solely from parametric knowledge, limiting quality and reach. We introduce CodeDistiller, a system that automatically distills large collections of scientific Github repositories into a vetted library of working domain-specific code examples, allowing ASD agents to expand their capabilities without manual effort. Using a combination of automatic and domain-expert evaluation on 250 materials science repositories, we find the best model is capable of producing functional examples for 74% of repositories, while our downstream evaluation shows an ASD agent augmented with a CodeDistiller generated library produces more accurate, complete, and scientifically sound experiments than an agent with only general materials-science code examples. We also evaluate LLM-as-a-judge ratings against domain-expert ratings in an A/B testing paradigm, finding moderate agreement and suggesting that inexpensive proxy metrics may be feasible for evaluating scientific discovery systems at scale.
BibTeX
@misc{jansen_codedistiller_2026,
title = {{CodeDistiller}: {Automatically} {Generating} {Code} {Libraries} for {Scientific} {Coding} {Agents}},
shorttitle = {{CodeDistiller}},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01089},
doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2512.01089},
abstract = {Automated Scientific Discovery (ASD) systems can help automatically generate and run code-based experiments, but their capabilities are limited by the code they can reliably generate from parametric knowledge alone. As a result, current systems either mutate a small number of manually-crafted experiment examples, or operate solely from parametric knowledge, limiting quality and reach. We introduce CodeDistiller, a system that automatically distills large collections of scientific Github repositories into a vetted library of working domain-specific code examples, allowing ASD agents to expand their capabilities without manual effort. Using a combination of automatic and domain-expert evaluation on 250 materials science repositories, we find the best model is capable of producing functional examples for 74\% of repositories, while our downstream evaluation shows an ASD agent augmented with a CodeDistiller generated library produces more accurate, complete, and scientifically sound experiments than an agent with only general materials-science code examples. We also evaluate LLM-as-a-judge ratings against domain-expert ratings in an A/B testing paradigm, finding moderate agreement and suggesting that inexpensive proxy metrics may be feasible for evaluating scientific discovery systems at scale.},
urldate = {2026-11-05},
publisher = {arXiv},
author = {Jansen, Peter and Hassan, Samiah and Narasimha, Pragnya},
month = may,
year = {2026},
note = {arXiv:2512.01089 [cs.AI]},
keywords = {Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence},
}