|
2026 |
AI Coding Agents Can Reproduce Social Science Findings |
Alizadeh et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
AI-assisted teams outperform AI-led teams but not human-only teams in assessing research reproducibility in quantitative social science |
Brodeur et al. |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
|
2026 |
An Agentic Approach Towards Replication Package Quality Evaluation |
Mbida, Angermeir |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review |
Riehl et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Automated reproducibility assessments in the social and behavioral sciences using large language models |
Holtdirk et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Automated Reproducibility Has a Problem Statement Problem |
Snelleman et al. |
RAI Workshop at AAAI 2026 |
|
2026 |
Automating Computational Reproducibility in Social Science: Comparing Prompt-Based and Agent-Based Approaches |
Shah et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
AutoReproduce: Automatic AI Experiment Reproduction with Paper Lineage |
Zhao et al. |
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) |
|
2026 |
Can Coding Agents Reproduce Findings in Computational Materials Science? |
Huang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
CodeDistiller: Automatically Generating Code Libraries for Scientific Coding Agents |
Jansen et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Coding-agents can replicate scientific machine learning papers |
Hans, Bilionis |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Does It Reproduce? An open, auditable archive of reproducibility assessments of scientific publications |
Hamburg-Eppendorf |
|
|
2026 |
FIRE-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on the Rediscovery of Scientific Insights |
Wang et al. |
Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning |
|
2026 |
Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation |
Kapoor et al. |
International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) |
|
2026 |
Life After Benchmark Saturation: A Case Study of CORE-Bench |
Nadgir et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
MLReplicate: Benchmarking Autonomous Research Systems for Machine Learning Reproducibility |
Gaddipati et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
On the Computational Reproducibility of Human-Computer Interaction |
Iarygina et al. |
Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems |
|
2026 |
Paper2Code: Automating Code Generation from Scientific Papers in Machine Learning |
Seo et al. |
International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) |
|
2026 |
PaperRepro: Automated Computational Reproducibility Assessment for Social Science Papers |
Zhang et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
PRBench: End-to-end Paper Reproduction in Physics Research |
Qiu |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Read the Paper, Write the Code: Agentic Reproduction of Social-Science Results |
Kohler et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Reimagining research papers as interactive and reliable AI agents |
Miao et al. |
Nature |
|
2026 |
ReplicatorBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Replicability in Social and Behavioral Sciences |
Nguyen et al. |
Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 (KDD '26) |
|
2026 |
Reproducing ICML 2026 — Open Reproductions |
Face, alphaXiv |
|
|
2026 |
ReproRepo: Scaling Reproducibility Audits with GitHub Repository Issues |
Li et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Revibing Code from Papers: Reimplementing HCI Artifacts |
Adar et al. |
Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology |
|
2026 |
Revibing Code from Papers: Reimplementing HCI Artifacts |
Adar et al. |
Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '26) |
|
2026 |
RExBench: Can coding agents autonomously implement AI research extensions? |
Edwards et al. |
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) |
|
2026 |
Scaling Reproducibility: An AI-Assisted Workflow for Large-Scale Replication and Reanalysis |
Xu, Yang |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment |
Baumgärtner, Gurevych |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
The AI Replication Engine V2: Reading the Page, Mapping the Literature |
Barbarioli |
Institute for Replication blog |
|
2026 |
The AI Replication Engine: First Experiments and What's Next |
Barbarioli |
Institute for Replication (I4R) |
|
2026 |
The Story is Not the Science: Execution-Grounded Evaluation of Mechanistic Interpretability Research |
Bai et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
Towards a Science of AI Agent Reliability |
Rabanser et al. |
Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) |
|
2026 |
Towards Automating Scientific Review with Google's Paper Assistant Tool |
Jayaram et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
VERITAS: Towards a General-Purpose Replication Tool for Scientific Research |
Liu et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
What Makes AI Research Replicable? Executable Knowledge Graphs as Scientific Knowledge Representations |
Luo et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
What Papers Don't Tell You: Recovering Tacit Knowledge for Automated Paper Reproduction |
Li et al. |
arXiv |
|
2026 |
What We Learned by Reproducing 2,200 papers from ICML |
Abid et al. |
Hugging Face Blog |
|
2025 |
Exploring the use of AI authors and reviewers at Agents4Science |
Bianchi et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
From Reproduction to Replication: Evaluating Research Agents with Progressive Code Masking |
Kim et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
LMR-BENCH: Evaluating LLM Agent's Ability on Reproducing Language Modeling Research |
Yan et al. |
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing |
|
2025 |
PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Research |
Starace et al. |
Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning |
|
2025 |
RECODE-H: A Benchmark for Research Code Development with Interactive Human Feedback |
Miao et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
Reflective Paper-to-Code Reproduction Enabled by Fine-Grained Verification |
Zhou et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
ReplicationBench: Can AI Agents Replicate Astrophysics Research Papers? |
Ye et al. |
arXiv |
|
2025 |
REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research? |
Hu et al. |
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025 |
|
2025 |
ResearchCodeBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Implementing Novel Machine Learning Research Code |
Hua et al. |
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems |
|
2025 |
SciReplicate-Bench: Benchmarking LLMs in Agent-driven Algorithmic Reproduction from Research Papers |
Xiang et al. |
Conference on Language Modeling (COLM) |
|
2025 |
The 2025 ReproNLP Shared Task on Reproducibility of Evaluations in NLP: Overview and Results |
Belz et al. |
Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Generation, Evaluation and Metrics |
|
2024 |
AI Agents That Matter |
Kapoor et al. |
arXiv |
|
2024 |
CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmark |
Siegel et al. |
Transactions on Machine Learning Research |
|
2024 |
SUPER: Evaluating Agents on Setting Up and Executing Tasks from Research Repositories |
Bogin et al. |
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing |