ReplicHAI › Metascience: replication projects & definitions

Shared by Changkun Ou with everyone

52 entries Export .bib
Year ↓ Title added Authors Venue
Journal article 2026 Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences Aczel et al. Nature
Journal article 2026 Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences Tyner et al. Nature
Journal article 2026 Investigating the reproducibility of the social and behavioural sciences Miske et al. Nature
Journal article 2026 Reproducibility and robustness of economics and political science research Brodeur et al. Nature
Journal article 2026 TOP 2025: An update to the Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines Grant et al. Research Integrity and Peer Review
Journal article 2024 Nonstandard Errors Menkveld et al. The Journal of Finance
Journal article 2024 Report of the AEA Data Editor Vilhuber AEA Papers and Proceedings
Journal article 2023 Replication games: how to make reproducibility research more systematic Brodeur et al. Nature
Journal article 2023 The State of Play of Reproducibility in Statistics: An Empirical Analysis Xiong, Cribben The American Statistician
Journal article 2023 What's in a Badge? A Computational Reproducibility Investigation of the Open Data Badge Policy in One Issue of Psychological Science Crüwell et al. Psychological Science
Journal article 2022 Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers From Thirteen Journals Say “Often Not” Chang, Li Critical Finance Review
Journal article 2022 Many Labs 4: Failure to Replicate Mortality Salience Effect With and Without Original Author Involvement Klein et al. Collabra: Psychology
Journal article 2022 Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty Breznau et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Journal article 2022 Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science Nosek et al. Annual Review of Psychology
Journal article 2022 The past, present and future of Registered Reports Chambers, Tzavella Nature Human Behaviour
Journal article 2021 An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature with Registered Reports Scheel et al. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Journal article 2021 Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study Hardwicke et al. Royal Society Open Science
Journal article 2021 Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology Errington et al. eLife
Journal article 2021 Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology Errington et al. eLife
Preprint 2021 Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence (SCORE) Alipourfard et al. SocArXiv
Journal article 2020 Analysis of Open Data and Computational Reproducibility in Registered Reports in Psychology Obels et al. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Webpage 2020 Artifact Review and Badging — Version 1.1 Machinery
Journal article 2020 Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability Ebersole et al. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Journal article 2020 Reproducibility and Replicability in Economics Vilhuber Harvard Data Science Review
Journal article 2020 Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams Botvinik-Nezer et al. Nature
Journal article 2020 What is replication? Nosek, Errington PLOS Biology
Book 2019 Reproducibility and Replicability in Science Medicine The National Academies Press
Journal article 2019 What's next for Registered Reports? Chambers Nature
Journal article 2018 An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility Stodden et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Journal article 2018 Badges for sharing data and code at Biostatistics: an observational study Rowhani-Farid, Barnett F1000Research
Journal article 2018 Data Availability, Reusability, and Analytic Reproducibility: Evaluating the Impact of a Mandatory Open Data Policy at the Journal Cognition Hardwicke et al. Royal Society Open Science
Journal article 2018 Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 Camerer et al. Nature Human Behaviour
Journal article 2018 Making replication mainstream Zwaan et al. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Journal article 2018 Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results Silberzahn et al. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Journal article 2018 Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings Klein et al. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Journal article 2018 Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology Through a Distributed Collaborative Network Moshontz Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Journal article 2018 Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology Plesser Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
Preprint 2018 Terminologies for Reproducible Research Barba arXiv
Journal article 2018 The preregistration revolution Nosek et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Journal article 2016 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility Baker Nature
Journal article 2016 Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency Kidwell et al. PLOS Biology
Journal article 2016 Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics Camerer et al. Science
Journal article 2016 Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication Ebersole et al. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Journal article 2016 What does research reproducibility mean? Goodman et al. Science Translational Medicine
Journal article 2015 Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science Collaboration Science
Report 2015 Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers from Thirteen Journals Say “Usually Not” Chang, Li Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Journal article 2015 Promoting an open research culture Nosek et al. Science
Journal article 2014 An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research Errington et al. eLife
Journal article 2014 Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project Klein et al. Social Psychology
Journal article 2011 False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant Simmons et al. Psychological Science
Journal article 2005 Why Most Published Research Findings Are False Ioannidis PLoS Medicine
Conference paper 1992 Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning Claerbout, Karrenbach SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992

/ filter · j k or ↑ ↓ select · Enter open page · c copy BibTeX