|
2026 |
Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences |
Aczel et al. |
Nature |
|
2026 |
Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences |
Tyner et al. |
Nature |
|
2026 |
Investigating the reproducibility of the social and behavioural sciences |
Miske et al. |
Nature |
|
2026 |
Reproducibility and robustness of economics and political science research |
Brodeur et al. |
Nature |
|
2026 |
TOP 2025: An update to the Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines |
Grant et al. |
Research Integrity and Peer Review |
|
2024 |
Nonstandard Errors |
Menkveld et al. |
The Journal of Finance |
|
2024 |
Report of the AEA Data Editor |
Vilhuber |
AEA Papers and Proceedings |
|
2023 |
Replication games: how to make reproducibility research more systematic |
Brodeur et al. |
Nature |
|
2023 |
The State of Play of Reproducibility in Statistics: An Empirical Analysis |
Xiong, Cribben |
The American Statistician |
|
2023 |
What's in a Badge? A Computational Reproducibility Investigation of the Open Data Badge Policy in One Issue of Psychological Science |
Crüwell et al. |
Psychological Science |
|
2022 |
Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers From Thirteen Journals Say “Often Not” |
Chang, Li |
Critical Finance Review |
|
2022 |
Many Labs 4: Failure to Replicate Mortality Salience Effect With and Without Original Author Involvement |
Klein et al. |
Collabra: Psychology |
|
2022 |
Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty |
Breznau et al. |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
|
2022 |
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science |
Nosek et al. |
Annual Review of Psychology |
|
2022 |
The past, present and future of Registered Reports |
Chambers, Tzavella |
Nature Human Behaviour |
|
2021 |
An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature with Registered Reports |
Scheel et al. |
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science |
|
2021 |
Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study |
Hardwicke et al. |
Royal Society Open Science |
|
2021 |
Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology |
Errington et al. |
eLife |
|
2021 |
Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology |
Errington et al. |
eLife |
|
2021 |
Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence (SCORE) |
Alipourfard et al. |
SocArXiv |
|
2020 |
Analysis of Open Data and Computational Reproducibility in Registered Reports in Psychology |
Obels et al. |
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science |
|
2020 |
Artifact Review and Badging — Version 1.1 |
Machinery |
|
|
2020 |
Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability |
Ebersole et al. |
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science |
|
2020 |
Reproducibility and Replicability in Economics |
Vilhuber |
Harvard Data Science Review |
|
2020 |
Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams |
Botvinik-Nezer et al. |
Nature |
|
2020 |
What is replication? |
Nosek, Errington |
PLOS Biology |
|
2019 |
Reproducibility and Replicability in Science |
Medicine |
The National Academies Press |
|
2019 |
What's next for Registered Reports? |
Chambers |
Nature |
|
2018 |
An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility |
Stodden et al. |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
|
2018 |
Badges for sharing data and code at Biostatistics: an observational study |
Rowhani-Farid, Barnett |
F1000Research |
|
2018 |
Data Availability, Reusability, and Analytic Reproducibility: Evaluating the Impact of a Mandatory Open Data Policy at the Journal Cognition |
Hardwicke et al. |
Royal Society Open Science |
|
2018 |
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 |
Camerer et al. |
Nature Human Behaviour |
|
2018 |
Making replication mainstream |
Zwaan et al. |
Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
|
2018 |
Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results |
Silberzahn et al. |
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science |
|
2018 |
Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings |
Klein et al. |
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science |
|
2018 |
Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology Through a Distributed Collaborative Network |
Moshontz |
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science |
|
2018 |
Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology |
Plesser |
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics |
|
2018 |
Terminologies for Reproducible Research |
Barba |
arXiv |
|
2018 |
The preregistration revolution |
Nosek et al. |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
|
2016 |
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility |
Baker |
Nature |
|
2016 |
Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency |
Kidwell et al. |
PLOS Biology |
|
2016 |
Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics |
Camerer et al. |
Science |
|
2016 |
Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication |
Ebersole et al. |
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |
|
2016 |
What does research reproducibility mean? |
Goodman et al. |
Science Translational Medicine |
|
2015 |
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science |
Collaboration |
Science |
|
2015 |
Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers from Thirteen Journals Say “Usually Not” |
Chang, Li |
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System |
|
2015 |
Promoting an open research culture |
Nosek et al. |
Science |
|
2014 |
An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research |
Errington et al. |
eLife |
|
2014 |
Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project |
Klein et al. |
Social Psychology |
|
2011 |
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant |
Simmons et al. |
Psychological Science |
|
2005 |
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False |
Ioannidis |
PLoS Medicine |
|
1992 |
Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning |
Claerbout, Karrenbach |
SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992 |