Preprint · 2024
AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents
| Venue | arXiv |
|---|---|
| DOI | 10.48550/arXiv.2401.13178 |
| URL | http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13178 |
| Topics | ReplicHAI / Agent Evals / 07 General, long-horizon & economic tasks |
| Tags | Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science - Computation and Language, Computer Science - Machine Learning |
| archiveID | arXiv:2401.13178 |
| extra | arXiv:2401.13178 [cs.CL] |
| libraryCatalog | arXiv.org |
| shortTitle | AgentBoard |
Abstract
Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) as general-purpose agents is essential for understanding their capabilities and facilitating their integration into practical applications. However, the evaluation process presents substantial challenges. A primary obstacle is the benchmarking of agent performance across diverse scenarios within a unified framework, especially in maintaining partially-observable environments and ensuring multi-round interactions. Moreover, current evaluation frameworks mostly focus on the final success rate, revealing few insights during the process and failing to provide a deep understanding of the model abilities. To address these challenges, we introduce AgentBoard, a pioneering comprehensive benchmark and accompanied open-source evaluation framework tailored to analytical evaluation of LLM agents. AgentBoard offers a fine-grained progress rate metric that captures incremental advancements as well as a comprehensive evaluation toolkit that features easy assessment of agents for multi-faceted analysis. This not only sheds light on the capabilities and limitations of LLM agents but also propels the interpretability of their performance to the forefront. Ultimately, AgentBoard serves as a step towards demystifying agent behaviors and accelerating the development of stronger LLM agents.
BibTeX
@misc{ma_agentboard_2024,
title = {{AgentBoard}: {An} {Analytical} {Evaluation} {Board} of {Multi}-turn {LLM} {Agents}},
shorttitle = {{AgentBoard}},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13178},
doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2401.13178},
abstract = {Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) as general-purpose agents is essential for understanding their capabilities and facilitating their integration into practical applications. However, the evaluation process presents substantial challenges. A primary obstacle is the benchmarking of agent performance across diverse scenarios within a unified framework, especially in maintaining partially-observable environments and ensuring multi-round interactions. Moreover, current evaluation frameworks mostly focus on the final success rate, revealing few insights during the process and failing to provide a deep understanding of the model abilities. To address these challenges, we introduce AgentBoard, a pioneering comprehensive benchmark and accompanied open-source evaluation framework tailored to analytical evaluation of LLM agents. AgentBoard offers a fine-grained progress rate metric that captures incremental advancements as well as a comprehensive evaluation toolkit that features easy assessment of agents for multi-faceted analysis. This not only sheds light on the capabilities and limitations of LLM agents but also propels the interpretability of their performance to the forefront. Ultimately, AgentBoard serves as a step towards demystifying agent behaviors and accelerating the development of stronger LLM agents.},
urldate = {2026-11-06},
publisher = {arXiv},
author = {Ma, Chang and Zhang, Junlei and Zhu, Zhihao and Yang, Cheng and Yang, Yujiu and Jin, Yaohui and Lan, Zhenzhong and Kong, Lingpeng and He, Junxian},
month = dec,
year = {2024},
note = {arXiv:2401.13178 [cs.CL]},
keywords = {Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science - Computation and Language, Computer Science - Machine Learning},
}