Bayesian Optimization
Part X: Synthesis
中文

Synthesis

The book closes by drawing its threads together. A single comparison turns out to mix several things: a stable preference, structured noise in how options are evaluated, change caused by the question itself, and answers that are incomplete or deliberately random. That makes preferential optimization both an estimate and an intervention, and it changes what a good system and a good study look like.

The three chapters say what a comparison measures, give concrete recommendations for building and evaluating a preferential optimization system (including when a simpler method should win), and end with the open problems, the one experiment that would most change our understanding, and an outlook on the research directions where the problem these methods address is growing.

The part draws on the whole book but is written to be readable on its own.

Chapters in this part

  1. 45 What a Comparison Measures

    Where the field's difficulty now lies, which results from other disciplines survived scrutiny, and what one comparison measures: a stable preference, structured evaluation noise, change caused by the query, and answers with no preference behind them. A preferential optimization session is both an estimate and an intervention.

  2. 46 Building and Evaluating a Preferential Optimization System

    Concrete recommendations for deciding whether to use preferential optimization at all, and then for the observation model, the surrogate, query design, non-stationarity, stopping, evaluation, and ethics, with the situations in which a simpler method should be the default.

  3. 47 Open Problems and the Decisive Experiment

    Eighteen open problems, each with an experiment that would settle it, the one experiment nobody has run (randomize the query order and retest a week later) described concretely enough to run, and the conclusion of the book.

References for Part X

127 works cited across this part's chapters.

  1. Adesiji, A. D., Wang, J., Kuo, C.-S., and Brown, K. A. (2026). Benchmarking self-driving labs. Digital Discovery. Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  2. Agranov, M., and Ortoleva, P. (2025). Ranges of Randomization. Review of Economics and Statistics. Ch. 45
  3. Alós-Ferrer, C., Fehr, E., and Garagnani, M. (2023). Identifying Nontransitive Preferences. University of Zurich. working paper Ch. 45
  4. Ambuehl, S., Bernheim, B. D., and Lusardi, A. (2022). Evaluating Deliberative Competence: A Simple Method with an Application to Financial Choice. American Economic Review. Ch. 45
  5. Andersson, D., Lindberg, M., Tinghög, G., and Persson, E. (2025). No evidence for decision fatigue using large-scale field data from healthcare. Communications Psychology. Ch. 45
  6. Ashton, H., and Franklin, M. (2022). Solutions to preference manipulation in recommender systems require knowledge of meta-preferences. FAccTRec Workshop (RecSys 2022). workshop paper Ch. 45
  7. Astudillo, R., Lin, Z. J., Bakshy, E., and Frazier, P. (2023). qEUBO: A Decision-Theoretic Acquisition Function for Preferential Bayesian Optimization. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. Ch. 45
  8. Bagaïni, A., Liu, Y., Kapoor, M., Son, G., Bürkner, P.-C., Tisdall, L., and Mata, R. (2025). A systematic review and meta-analyses of the temporal stability and convergent validity of risk preference measures. Nature Human Behaviour. doi:10.1038/s41562-024-02085-2. Ch. 45
  9. Bavard, S., and Palminteri, S. (2023). The functional form of value normalization in human reinforcement learning. eLife. Ch. 45
  10. Bavard, S., Lebreton, M., Khamassi, M., Coricelli, G., and Palminteri, S. (2018). Reference-point centering and range-adaptation enhance human reinforcement learning at the cost of irrational preferences. Nature Communications. Ch. 45
  11. Benavoli, A., Azzimonti, D., and Piga, D. (2021c). Preferential Bayesian optimisation with skew gaussian processes. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion. Ch. 46
  12. Bénon, J., Lee, D., Hopper, W., Verdeil, M., Pessiglione, M., Vinckier, F., … Daunizeau, J. (2024). The online metacognitive control of decisions. Communications Psychology. doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00071-y. Ch. 46
  13. Bernheim, B. D., and Rangel, A. (2009). Beyond Revealed Preference: Choice-Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics *. Quarterly Journal of Economics. Ch. 45
  14. Bhatia, S., and Loomes, G. (2017). Noisy preferences in risky choice: A cautionary note. Psychological Review. Ch. 45
  15. Bhatnagar, R., and Orquin, J. L. (2022). A meta-analysis on the effect of visual attention on choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Ch. 46
  16. Bıyık, E., Palan, M., Landolfi, N. C., Losey, D. P., and Sadigh, D. (2019). Asking Easy Questions: A User-Friendly Approach to Active Reward Learning. CoRL 2019. Ch. 46
  17. Brielmann, A. A., Berentelg, M., and Dayan, P. (2024). Modelling individual aesthetic judgements over time. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Ch. 45
  18. Brown, A. L., Imai, T., Vieider, F. M., and Camerer, C. F. (2024). Meta-analysis of Empirical Estimates of Loss Aversion. Journal of Economic Literature. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  19. Carroll, M., Dragan, A., Russell, S., and Hadfield-Menell, D. (2022). Estimating and Penalizing Induced Preference Shifts in Recommender Systems. ICML 2022. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  20. Carroll, M., Chan, A., Ashton, H., and Krueger, D. (2023). Characterizing Manipulation from AI Systems. Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  21. Carroll, M., Foote, D., Siththaranjan, A., Russell, S., and Dragan, A. (2024). AI Alignment with Changing and Influenceable Reward Functions. International Conference on Machine Learning. Ch. 45 Ch. 47
  22. Cettolin, E., and Riedl, A. (2019). Revealed preferences under uncertainty: Incomplete preferences and preferences for randomization. Journal of Economic Theory. Ch. 45
  23. Chang, R. (2024). What’s so Hard about Hard Choices? Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics. doi:10.23941/ejpe.v17i1.872. Ch. 45
  24. Chidambaram, K., Seetharaman, K. V., and Syrgkanis, V. (2026). Direct Preference Optimization with Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The Necessity of Ternary Preferences. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  25. Choung, O.-H., Vianello, R., Segler, M., Stiefl, N., and Jiménez-Luna, J. (2023). Extracting medicinal chemistry intuition via preference machine learning. Nature Communications. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42242-1. Ch. 45
  26. Costa-Gomes, M. A., Cueva, C., Gerasimou, G., and Tejišcák, M. (2022). Choice, deferral, and consistency. Quantitative Economics. Ch. 45
  27. De Witte, S., Taets, J., Retzler, A., Crevecoeur, G., and Lefebvre, T. (2025). How to Capture Human Preference: Commissioning of a Robotic Use-Case via Preferential Bayesian Optimisation. arXiv. preprint Ch. 45
  28. Dean, S., and Morgenstern, J. (2022). Preference Dynamics Under Personalized Recommendations. EC 2022. Ch. 45 Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  29. Deneault, J. R., Kim, W., Kim, J., Gu, Y., Chang, J., Maruyama, B., Myung, J. I., and Pitt, M. A. (2025). Preferential Bayesian optimization improves the efficiency of printing objects with subjective qualities. Digital Discovery. Ch. 47
  30. Díaz, M. A., Nuzzo, S., Flynn, L., Beckerle, P., Verstraten, T., and De Pauw, K. (2026). User preference in the personalized control of an ankle prosthesis: a case study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. doi:10.1186/s12984-026-01931-w. Ch. 46
  31. Ding, Y., Kim, M., Kuindersma, S., and Walsh, C. J. (2018). Human-in-the-Loop Optimization of Hip Assistance with a Soft Exosuit during Walking. Science Robotics. Ch. 47
  32. Ding, L., Zhang, J., Clune, J., Spector, L., and Lehman, J. (2024). Quality Diversity through Human Feedback: Towards Open-Ended Diversity-Driven Optimization. ICML 2024. Ch. 46
  33. Doumont, C., Fan, D., Maus, N., Gardner, J. R., Moss, H., and Pleiss, G. (2026). We Still Don't Understand High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization. AISTATS 2026 (best student paper). Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  34. Engelmann, D., and Hollard, G. (2010). Reconsidering the Effect of Market Experience on the "Endowment Effect". Econometrica. Ch. 45
  35. Enisman, M., Shpitzer, H., and Kleiman, T. (2021). Choice changes preferences, not merely reflects them: A meta-analysis of the artifact-free free-choice paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Ch. 45 Ch. 47
  36. Erarslan, A., Sevilla Salcedo, C., Tanskanen, V., Nisov, A., Päiväkumpu, E., Aisala, H., … Mikkola, P. (2025). Consecutive Preferential Bayesian Optimization. arXiv. preprint Ch. 46
  37. European Union (2022b). Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act). Official Journal of the European Union (EUR-Lex). non-peer-reviewed Ch. 46
  38. Evren, Ö., and Ok, E. A. (2011). On the multi-utility representation of preference relations. Journal of Mathematical Economics. Ch. 45
  39. Fauvel, T. (2021). Human-in-the-loop optimization of retinal prostheses encoders. Sorbonne Université. thesis Ch. 47
  40. Fischli, R., Franklin, M., Manzini, A., and Gabriel, I. (2026). Agents, Alignment, and the Many Faces of Autonomy. Minds and Machines. Ch. 45
  41. Fosgerau, M., Melo, E., de Palma, A., and Shum, M. (2020). Discrete Choice and Rational Inattention: A General Equivalence Result. International Economic Review. Ch. 45
  42. Fraser, I., Balcombe, K., Williams, L., and McSorley, E. (2021). Preference stability in discrete choice experiments. Some evidence using eye-tracking. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. Ch. 45
  43. Frederick, S., Lee, L., and Baskin, E. (2014). The Limits of Attraction. Journal of Marketing Research. Ch. 45
  44. Frömer, R., Dean Wolf, C. K., and Shenhav, A. (2019). Goal congruency dominates reward value in accounting for behavioral and neural correlates of value-based decision-making. Nature Communications. Ch. 45
  45. Ge, L., Halpern, D., Micha, E., Procaccia, A., Shapira, I., Vorobeychik, Y., and Wu, J. (2024). Axioms for AI Alignment from Human Feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37. Ch. 45
  46. Ghosal, G. R., Zurek, M., Brown, D. S., and Dragan, A. D. (2023). The Effect of Modeling Human Rationality Level on Learning Rewards from Multiple Feedback Types. AAAI. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  47. Gibbard, P., and Sadlier, K. (2025). Optimal adaptive Bayesian design in choice experiments: performance for the population versus individuals. Marketing Letters. Ch. 46
  48. Glickman, M., and Sharot, T. (2025). How human–AI feedback loops alter human perceptual, emotional and social judgements. Nature Human Behaviour. doi:10.1038/s41562-024-02077-2. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  49. Halstead, M. E., López‐Ibáñez, M., Farmer, G., and Warren, P. A. (2026). Multiobjective Optimisation for Others: How Anchoring Effects Change Based on Who Guides the Interaction. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Ch. 46
  50. Hardt, M., and Mendler-Dünner, C. (2025). Performative Prediction: Past and Future. Statistical Science. Ch. 45
  51. Hauser, J. R., and Toubia, O. (2005). The Impact of Utility Balance and Endogeneity in Conjoint Analysis. Marketing Science. Ch. 46
  52. Heckel, R., Shah, N. B., Ramchandran, K., and Wainwright, M. J. (2019). Active ranking from pairwise comparisons and when parametric assumptions do not help. The Annals of Statistics. Ch. 45
  53. Hendrickx, J. M., Olshevsky, A., and Saligrama, V. (2019). Graph Resistance and Learning from Pairwise Comparisons. ICML. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  54. Hvarfner, C., Hellsten, E. O., and Nardi, L. (2024). Vanilla Bayesian Optimization Performs Great in High Dimensions. International Conference on Machine Learning. Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  55. Ingraham, K. A., Remy, C. D., and Rouse, E. J. (2022). The role of user preference in the customized control of robotic exoskeletons. Science Robotics. Ch. 46
  56. Jiang, X., Lim, L.-H., Yao, Y., and Ye, Y. (2011). Statistical ranking and combinatorial Hodge theory. Mathematical Programming. Ch. 45
  57. Johnston, R. J., Boyle, K. J., Adamowicz, W. (., Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T. A., … Vossler, C. A. (2017). Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. Ch. 46
  58. Kanwal, M., and Tran, C. (2026). Constructive Alignment: Governing Preference Dynamics in Human-AI Interaction. AAAI-26 Workshop on Machine Ethics. workshop paper Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  59. Kayal, A., Vakili, S., Toni, L., Shiu, D.-S., and Bernacchia, A. (2025). Bayesian Optimization from Human Feedback: Near-Optimal Regret Bounds. International Conference on Machine Learning. Ch. 45 Ch. 47
  60. Keffert, H., and Schweizer, N. (2024). Stochastic Monotonicity and Random Utility Models: The Good and The Ugly. arXiv preprint 2409.00704. preprint Ch. 46
  61. Keswani, V., Conitzer, V., Heidari, H., Borg, J. S., and Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2024). On the Pros and Cons of Active Learning for Moral Preference Elicitation. AIES. Ch. 46
  62. Keswani, V., Cousins, C., Nguyen, B., Conitzer, V., Heidari, H., Borg, J. S., and Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2026). Moral Change or Noise? On Problems of Aligning AI With Temporally Unstable Human Feedback. AAAI. Ch. 45 Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  63. Kirk, H. R., Leqi, L., Zeng, F., Davidson, H., Vidgen, B., Summerfield, C., and Hale, S. A. (2026). PRISM-X: Experiments on Personalised Fine-Tuning with Human and Simulated Users. arXiv. preprint Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  64. Koyama, Y., Sato, I., and Goto, M. (2020). Sequential Gallery for Interactive Visual Design Optimization. ACM Transactions on Graphics 39(4) (SIGGRAPH 2020). Ch. 46
  65. Lazzaro, J., Buffelli, D., Shiu, D.-s., and Vakili, S. (2026). A Finite Time Analysis of Thompson Sampling for Bayesian Optimization with Preferential Feedback. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. Ch. 45 Ch. 47
  66. Li, S., Zhang, Y., Ren, Z., Liang, C., Li, N., and Shah, J. A. (2024a). Enhancing Preference-based Linear Bandits via Human Response Time. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Ch. 45
  67. Li, Y., Parashar, A., Zhou, E., and Fan, C. (2026c). Curiosity is Knowledge: Self-Consistent Learning and No-Regret Optimization with Active Inference. arXiv preprint 2602.06029. preprint Ch. 45
  68. Li, Z., Liao, Y.-C., and Holz, C. (2026f). Preference-Guided Prompt Optimization for Text-to-Image Generation. CHI 2026. Ch. 47
  69. Liao, Y.-C., Belo, J., Moon, H.-S., Steimle, J., and Feit, A. M. (2026). Efficient Human-in-the-Loop Optimization via Priors Learned from User Models. CHI 2026. Ch. 46
  70. Liu, C., Ling, S., and Jacobson, A. (2026b). GimmBO: Interactive Generative Image Model Merging via Bayesian Optimization. ACM Transactions on Graphics. doi:10.1145/3811293. Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  71. McCausland, W. J., Davis-Stober, C., Marley, A., Park, S., and Brown, N. (2020). Testing the Random Utility Hypothesis Directly. The Economic Journal. doi:10.1093/ej/uez039. Ch. 45
  72. Miettinen, K., Eskelinen, P., Ruiz, F., and Luque, M. (2010). NAUTILUS method: An interactive technique in multiobjective optimization based on the nadir point. European Journal of Operational Research. Ch. 46
  73. Millidge, B., Tschantz, A., and Buckley, C. L. (2021). Whence the Expected Free Energy? Neural Computation. Ch. 45
  74. Nielsen, K., and Rehbeck, J. (2022). When Choices Are Mistakes. American Economic Review. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  75. Nielsen, K., and Rigotti, L. (2026). Revealed Incomplete Preferences. Working paper (author's website). working paper Ch. 45 Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  76. Nieuwenstein, M. R., Wierenga, T., Morey, R. D., Wicherts, J. M., Blom, T. N., Wagenmakers, E.-J., and van Rijn, H. (2015). On making the right choice: A meta-analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage. Judgment and Decision Making. Ch. 45
  77. Niwa, R., Yoshida, S., Koyama, Y., and Ushiku, Y. (2025). Cooperative Design Optimization through Natural Language Interaction. UIST 2025. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  78. O'Mahony, M., and Wichchukit, S. (2017). The evolution of paired preference tests from forced choice to the use of ‘No Preference’ options, from preference frequencies to d′ values, from placebo pairs to signal detection. Trends in Food Science & Technology. Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  79. Oh, G., Lee, J., Park, J., Yu, Y., Bae, W., and Noh, J. (2026b). Random Is Hard to Beat: Active Selection in online DPO with Modern LLMs. ICLR 2026 Workshop: I Can't Believe It's Not Better (ICBINB). workshop paper Ch. 45 Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  80. Ok, E. A., and Tserenjigmid, G. (2022). Indifference, indecisiveness, experimentation, and stochastic choice. Theoretical Economics. Ch. 45 Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  81. Oprea, R. (2024). Decisions under Risk Are Decisions under Complexity. American Economic Review. Ch. 45
  82. Ou, C., Buschek, D., Mayer, S., and Butz, A. (2022). The Human in the Infinite Loop: A Case Study on Revealing and Explaining Human-AI Interaction Loop Failures. Mensch und Computer 2022. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  83. Owaki, T., Koyama, Y., Nakano, T., Yamaguchi, T., Goto, M., and Sakai, H. (2026). Learning Feasibility-Aware Latent Spaces for Preference-Based Exploration of Procedural Automotive Wheel Designs. arXiv. preprint Ch. 46
  84. Pásztor, B., Kassraie, P., and Krause, A. (2024). Bandits with Preference Feedback: A Stackelberg Game Perspective. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. doi:10.52202/079017-0383. Ch. 45
  85. Peng, Y.-H., Bigham, J. P., and Wu, J. (2026). Efficient Personalization of Generative User Interfaces. arXiv. preprint Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  86. Perdomo, J. C., Zrnic, T., Mendler-Dünner, C., and Hardt, M. (2020). Performative Prediction. ICML. Ch. 45
  87. Pettigrew, R. (2023). Nudging for changing selves. Synthese. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  88. Poggensee, K. L., and Collins, S. H. (2021). How adaptation, training, and customization contribute to benefits from exoskeleton assistance. Science Robotics. Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  89. Polanía, R., Woodford, M., and Ruff, C. C. (2019). Efficient coding of subjective value. Nature Neuroscience. Ch. 45
  90. Pombo, M., Brielmann, A. A., and Pelli, D. G. (2023). The intrinsic variance of beauty judgment. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. Ch. 45
  91. Prat-Carrabin, A., and Woodford, M. (2022). Efficient coding of numbers explains decision bias and noise. Nature Human Behaviour. Ch. 45
  92. Rajagopalan, R., Dutta, D., Wei, Y.-L., and Roy Choudhury, R. (2026). Personalized Image Generation via Human-in-the-loop Bayesian Optimization. International Conference on Machine Learning. Ch. 47
  93. Rotella, A., Jung, J., Chinn, C., and Barclay, P. (2026). Observation Moderates the Moral Licensing Effect: A Meta-Analytic Test of Interpersonal and Intrapsychic Mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Ch. 45
  94. Sauré, D., and Vielma, J. P. (2019). Ellipsoidal Methods for Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis. Operations Research. Ch. 46
  95. Sawarni, A., Sarmasarkar, S., and Syrgkanis, V. (2025). Preference Learning with Response Time: Robust Losses and Guarantees. NeurIPS. Ch. 46
  96. Schäfer, N., Zhao, G., Li, B., Kupnik, M., Seyfarth, A., Beckerle, P., and Grimmer, M. (2026). User preference-based human-in-the-loop tuning of exoskeleton assistance during walking. npj Biomedical Innovations. doi:10.1038/s44385-026-00085-7. Ch. 45 Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  97. Schoinas, E., Rastogi, A., Carter, A., Granley, J., and Beyeler, M. (2025). Evaluating Deep Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Retinal Implants Using Sighted Participants. 2025 47th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). doi:10.1109/embc58623.2025.11253762. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  98. Shah, N. B., Balakrishnan, S., Bradley, J., Parekh, A., Ramchandran, K., and Wainwright, M. J. (2016). Estimation from Pairwise Comparisons: Sharp Minimax Bounds with Topology Dependence. Journal of Machine Learning Research. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  99. Shao, K., Wang, J., Pei, X., and Mesbah, A. (2026). Adaptive KappaSharp: Condition-Number Shaping for Preferential Bayesian Optimization. arXiv. preprint Ch. 45 Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  100. Shen, B., Nguyen, D., Wilson, J., Glimcher, P. W., and Louie, K. (2025b). Early versus late noise differentially enhances or degrades context-dependent choice. Nature Communications. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59140-3. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  101. Shevlin, B. R. K., Smith, S. M., Hausfeld, J., and Krajbich, I. (2022). High-value decisions are fast and accurate, inconsistent with diminishing value sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  102. Shields, B. J., Stevens, J., Li, J., Parasram, M., Damani, F., Alvarado, J. I. M., … Doyle, A. G. (2021). Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis. Nature. Ch. 47
  103. Shvartsman, M., Letham, B., Bakshy, E., and Keeley, S. (2024). Response Time Improves Gaussian Process Models for Perception and Preferences. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Ch. 45 Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  104. Siivola, E., Dhaka, A. K., Andersen, M. R., González, J., García Moreno, P., and Vehtari, A. (2021). Preferential Batch Bayesian Optimization. IEEE MLSP 2021. Ch. 46
  105. Siththaranjan, A., Laidlaw, C., and Hadfield-Menell, D. (2024). Distributional Preference Learning: Understanding and Accounting for Hidden Context in RLHF. ICLR 2024. Ch. 45
  106. Stango, V., and Zinman, J. (2024). Behavioral Biases Are Temporally Stable. Working paper (author's website). working paper Ch. 45
  107. Strang, A., Abbott, K. C., and Thomas, P. J. (2022). The Network HHD: Quantifying Cyclic Competition in Trait-Performance Models of Tournaments. SIAM Review. Ch. 45
  108. Sui, Y., Zhuang, V., Burdick, J., and Yue, Y. (2018b). Stagewise Safe Bayesian Optimization with Gaussian Processes. International Conference on Machine Learning. Ch. 47
  109. Taddei, S., Koppen, W., Alfio, E., Nuzzo, S., Flynn, L., Diaz, M. A., … Verstraten, T. (2026). Bayesian Preference Elicitation: Human-In-The-Loop Optimization of An Active Prosthesis. arXiv. preprint Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  110. Takeno, S., Nomura, M., and Karasuyama, M. (2023). Towards Practical Preferential Bayesian Optimization with Skew Gaussian Processes. International Conference on Machine Learning. Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  111. Vaidis, D. C., Sleegers, W. W. A., van Leeuwen, F., DeMarree, K. G., Sætrevik, B., Ross, R. M., … Priolo, D. (2024). A Multilab Replication of the Induced-Compliance Paradigm of Cognitive Dissonance. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. Ch. 45
  112. Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S. H., Davidov, E., Cieciuch, J., Alessandri, G., and Marsicano, G. (2020). Stability and change of basic personal values in early adolescence: A 2‐year longitudinal study. Journal of Personality. Ch. 45 Ch. 47
  113. Vessel, E. A., Maurer, N., Denker, A. H., and Starr, G. G. (2018). Stronger shared taste for natural aesthetic domains than for artifacts of human culture. Cognition. Ch. 45 Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  114. Viappiani, P., and Boutilier, C. (2020). On the equivalence of optimal recommendation sets and myopically optimal query sets. Artificial Intelligence. Ch. 45
  115. Vohs, K. D., Schmeichel, B. J., Lohmann, S., Gronau, Q. F., Finley, A. J., Ainsworth, S. E., … Albarracín, D. (2021). A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect. Psychological Science. Ch. 45
  116. Vyas, D., Brummet, R., Anwar, Y., Jensen, J., Jorgensen, E., Wu, Y.-H., and Chipara, O. (2022). Personalizing over-the-counter hearing aids using pairwise comparisons. Smart Health. doi:10.1016/j.smhl.2021.100231. Ch. 47
  117. Wadinambiarachchi, S., Kelly, R. M., Pareek, S., Zhou, Q., and Velloso, E. (2024). The Effects of Generative AI on Design Fixation and Divergent Thinking. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Ch. 46
  118. Williams, M., Carroll, M., Narang, A., Weisser, C., Murphy, B., and Dragan, A. (2025). On Targeted Manipulation and Deception when Optimizing LLMs for User Feedback. ICLR 2025. Ch. 45 Ch. 46
  119. Wilson, J. T. (2024). Stopping Bayesian Optimization with Probabilistic Regret Bounds. NeurIPS 2024. Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  120. Wu, K., and Gardner, J. R. (2026). Knowledge Gradient for Preference Learning. arXiv. preprint Ch. 45 Ch. 47
  121. Xie, Q., Cai, L., Terenin, A., Frazier, P. I., and Scully, Z. (2026). Cost-aware Stopping for Bayesian Optimization. International Conference on Machine Learning. Ch. 46 Ch. 47
  122. Xu, W., Wang, W., Jiang, Y., Svetozarevic, B., and Jones, C. (2024b). Principled Preferential Bayesian Optimization. International Conference on Machine Learning. Ch. 45
  123. Yap, S. C. Y., Wortman, J., Anusic, I., Baker, S. G., Scherer, L. D., Donnellan, M. B., and Lucas, R. E. (2017). The effect of mood on judgments of subjective well-being: Nine tests of the judgment model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Ch. 45
  124. Yechiam, E., and Zeif, D. (2025). Loss aversion is not robust: A re-meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology. Ch. 45
  125. Zhang, X., Huang, D., Kaski, S., and Martinelli, J. (2025a). PABBO: Preferential Amortized Black-Box Optimization. ICLR 2025. Ch. 45
  126. Zhang, R., Zhu, X., Pourebadi Khotbehsara, M., Dao, W., Bıyık, E., and Culbertson, H. (2026b). Vibrotactile Preference Learning: Uncertainty-Aware Preference Learning for Personalized Vibration Feedback. UMAP 2026 (per Semantic Scholar). Ch. 45
  127. Zylberberg, A., Bakkour, A., Shohamy, D., and Shadlen, M. N. (2024). Value construction through sequential sampling explains serial dependencies in decision making. eLife. doi:10.7554/eLife.96997. Ch. 45 Ch. 46 Ch. 47